Is Devin free to use?

Devin offers a free tier with paid upgrades available.

What category does Devin belong to?

Devin is a Development Tools tool with expertise in TypeScript.

How do I get started with Devin?

Visit the official Devin website to get started. You can access it through the 'Visit Website' button on this page.

Devin - Development Tools Tool for MVP Building

Development Tools • Freemium

Devin helps dev teams act like a junior developer by creating PRs and assisting with code changes.

devin.ai

Best for:

• Automating small PRs and routine refactors in well-maintained repos
• Assisting teams that want an extra 'junior' pair of hands for low-risk tasks
• Scaling review capacity for corporate teams with clear CI and tests

Not for:

• Messy or undocumented codebases without tests
• Security-critical or business-logic-heavy changes
• Projects that require deep architectural or domain knowledge

Devin started as "not expensive anymore" in the notes I found — it’s a freemium tool that clearly targets corporate teams and positions itself as a junior dev on your repo. It can open pull requests, propose changes, and generally work alongside you or your team rather than replacing reviewers. I’ve tried it enough to see where it fits: if your repo is well-structured, has clear tests and CI, Devin can be surprisingly helpful. It shines on small tasks—automated refactors, formatting, simple bug fixes, or routine improvements where intent is obvious. It’s nice for offloading noise-level PRs so senior devs can focus on tougher architecture work. That said, it didn’t work as well for me on a messy repo. If your codebase is inconsistent, lacks tests, or has unclear boundaries, Devin tends to generate PRs that are plausible but sometimes incorrect or incomplete. You’ll need to review everything closely. Also expect some churn: PRs may need iteration, and it won’t magically understand nuanced business logic or complex system interactions. When to use it: adopt Devin for mature, well-tested repositories and for teams that want to automate small, repeatable changes. When to skip it: don’t rely on it for brittle legacy monoliths, security-sensitive code, or design-level decisions. Bottom line: Devin can act like a helpful junior dev in the right environment. It’s not flawless and needs human oversight, but it can save time on routine PRs when the repo is tidy.

Devin started as "not expensive anymore" in the notes I found — it’s a freemium tool that clearly targets corporate teams and positions itself as a junior dev on your repo. It can open pull requests, propose changes, and generally work alongside you or your team rather than replacing reviewers.

I’ve tried it enough to see where it fits: if your repo is well-structured, has clear tests and CI, Devin can be surprisingly helpful. It shines on small tasks—automated refactors, formatting, simple bug fixes, or routine improvements where intent is obvious. It’s nice for offloading noise-level PRs so senior devs can focus on tougher architecture work.

That said, it didn’t work as well for me on a messy repo. If your codebase is inconsistent, lacks tests, or has unclear boundaries, Devin tends to generate PRs that are plausible but sometimes incorrect or incomplete. You’ll need to review everything closely. Also expect some churn: PRs may need iteration, and it won’t magically understand nuanced business logic or complex system interactions.

When to use it: adopt Devin for mature, well-tested repositories and for teams that want to automate small, repeatable changes. When to skip it: don’t rely on it for brittle legacy monoliths, security-sensitive code, or design-level decisions.

Bottom line: Devin can act like a helpful junior dev in the right environment. It’s not flawless and needs human oversight, but it can save time on routine PRs when the repo is tidy.

Tradeoffs:

Devin can quickly generate useful PRs, but those PRs often require careful human review—it performs best on clean, well-tested repositories and struggles with messy code.